Mounting Opposition to EUDR: Can Changes in Food Industry Be Avoided?
As the deadlines for the new EU Due Diligence Regulation (EUDR) approach, resistance from various sectors of the food industry is becoming increasingly evident. Initiatives aimed at strengthening import controls on food products are facing pushback from both producers and trade networks. Nevertheless, the European Commission continues to uphold its stance, believing that necessary changes must be implemented to protect the environment and consumer health.
Recently, a series of meetings took place between representatives of the food sector and registered lobbyists opposing the upcoming changes in the supply system. Participants in these meetings expressed concerns that the new regulation could create additional barriers for imports, significantly increasing costs and complicating supply processes. Both sides are attempting to find a compromise; however, experts warn that time is running out, and each decision can impact the global food supply chain.
Among the opponents of the EUDR are not only local producers but also large multinational companies concerned about the potential repercussions for their business. Amid rising commodity prices and increased logistics costs, the changes could impose an additional burden that they cannot bear.
Meanwhile, representatives of the European Commission emphasize that reforms are necessary to achieve climate goals and maintain consumer health. They argue that the new regulations will reduce pollution levels and improve food quality, ultimately benefiting more than harming.
In the face of escalating pressure from both sides, the chances of reaching a compromise are diminishing. Many market participants remain in the dark about how new rules will be shaped and how they will affect their business models. Observers are calling for more active dialogue to deepen the understanding of all stakeholders and find stable solutions.
